Dominos! Damn!
Mar. 19th, 2006 02:21 amSo, V for Vendetta was pretty cool. I won't rant about You Know What because it's so blatantly there and no one really cares and whatever. So! I give my vote to Hugo Weaving as Supreme Ruler of the Universe for his sheer coolness factor only. Oh man. Natalie Portman was pretty excellent herself. My question: Why did she suck so bad in Star Wars? I WANT TO HAVE OUR BABY ON NABOOOOOOO *petstrokestrokebrush hair* WHATEVS, NATALIE. You should go through torture more, maybe. Oh, snap!
I very much like the 1812. Always have.
Anyway. Fun for the whole family*.
The new X-Men 3 trailer pretty much made my head expload it looks so cool. OH MAN. MUTANTS. MAN.
I'm soooo tiiiired and I'm getting a bit giddy so I think it's time for bed.
*...Yeah, um, not really.
I very much like the 1812. Always have.
Anyway. Fun for the whole family*.
The new X-Men 3 trailer pretty much made my head expload it looks so cool. OH MAN. MUTANTS. MAN.
I'm soooo tiiiired and I'm getting a bit giddy so I think it's time for bed.
*...Yeah, um, not really.
I need to see Vee!
Date: 2006-03-19 04:27 pm (UTC)For reals, though - I think it was definitely the direction and writing in the Star Wars prequels that made them teh sux.
I mean, Natalie Portman and Ewan McGregor are great actors. And the movies were subpar anyhow.
X3! It's not a coincidence that it also makes the really happy three-mouth face!
Re: I need to see Vee!
Date: 2006-03-20 03:57 am (UTC)BWAH!! That alone means it's going to be the BEST MOVIE EVER
next to SNAKES. ON A PLANE.no subject
Date: 2006-03-19 05:55 pm (UTC)Hehehe, you crack me up!
Did someone mention Ewan!???! *wide awake now ... drooling*
no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 03:57 am (UTC)Omg Ewan kind of makes me flail. A lot.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-19 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 03:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 07:04 pm (UTC)Perhaps if "everyone" in Star Wars IS Natalie Portman, Ewan McGregor, and Yoda (Frank Oz)... then yes. Because they're all my babies. :D
no subject
Date: 2006-03-19 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 01:40 am (UTC)But that's my theory based on rumor.
♥
no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 04:53 am (UTC)Yet, that really doesn't justify it. :/